Microsoft word - hiv hep c guidelines ver 2 26.5.08
GUIDELINE FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF HIV
INFECTION IN PEOPLE
WITH HAEMOPHILIA
Australian Haemophilia Centre Directors'
Disclaimer
This document is a general guide to appropriate practice, to be followed subject
to the clinician's expert judgement and the patient's preference in each individual
case. The guidelines are designed to provide information to assist decision-
making and are based on consensus opinion at the time of compilation. The
guidelines were reviewed in 2008.
These guidelines will be reviewed again in 2011.
Users of these guidelines are encouraged to contact the Australian Haemophilia
Centre Directors' Organisation if they have comments to make. These comments
will inform the revision process.
Users can contact the Australian Haemophilia Centre Directors' Organisation by
1622 High Street,
1. Introduction
The Guideline for the Management of HIV and Hep C Infection in People with
Haemophilia has been developed by the Australian Haemophilia Centre
Directors' Organisation (AHCDO). Consultation has occurred with a range of
stakeholders including the Australian Liver Association of the Gastroenterological
Society of Australia, the Australasian Society for HIV Medicine, the Australian
Hepatitis Council and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
The Australian National Council on AIDS, Hepatitis C and Related Diseases
(ANCAHRD) has published a comprehensive guideline, A Model of Care for the
Management of Hepatitis C Infection in Adults [1] which, ‘by providing best
practice information to medical practitioners, seeks to provide a framework in
which people with hepatitis C are clearly informed about treatment and
management options available to them'. The Model of Care aims to ‘enable both
clients and clinicians to make informed decisions regarding management
options'. The National Health Act Section 100 criteria for access to pegylated
interferon combination therapy are updated regularly and should be referred to
determine up to date treatment options.
The Australasian Society for HIV Medicine (ASHM) has published a clinical
guideline for the management of HIV [2] which comprehensively deals with basic
HIV virology, immunology and tools to monitor HIV disease; antiretroviral therapy
and clinical presentations. In addition, the ASHM has also published an extensive
guide for the clinical management of HIV and hepatitis co-infection [3] which is
designed to meet the needs of clinicians and addresses HIV/hepatitis C
coinfection and hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy.
These three clinical guidelines [1, 2, 3] offer expert guidance to appropriate
practice for the management of HIV and hepatitis C infection and AHCDO
endorses the recommendations contained within these documents. Although it is
not the intention of these AHCDO guidelines to duplicate material already
published, it is pertinent that for those patients with HIV and/or hepatitis C
infection who also have haemophilia or a related bleeding disorder there are
additional issues to be considered. Hence, the aim of this guideline is to address
the clinical management of issues relating to HIV and/or hepatitis C infection
specifically in people with haemophilia or a related bleeding disorder (PWH).
Data from the Australian Bleeding Disorder Registry1 (ABDR) suggests that over
50% of people with haemophilia A are infected with hepatitis C and over 45% of
people with haemophilia B are infected with hepatitis C. Data indicates that all
the PWH and HIV are also coinfected with hepatitis C.
The primary audience for these AHCDO guidelines is intended to be clinicians
treating people with haemophilia who are also infected with HIV and/or Hepatitis
C. Physicians, nurses, medical students, allied health professionals and
individuals with a specific interest in these conditions may also find these
guidelines of use.
2. Methods
The guidelines were drafted by a small Working Party of Haemophilia Centre
Directors appointed by the AHCDO Executive Committee. Members of the
Working Party made a declaration of interest to the Chairman AHCDO. A draft
copy of the guideline was widely circulated for consultation.
3. Management
3.1. General
It is recommended that PWH be managed within a comprehensive Haemophilia
Treatment Centre (HTC). These HTCs have been established in all states and
territories. The associated management of HIV and hepatitis C should be in
collaboration with specialised HIV medicine/infectious disease units, specialised
1 The ABDR does not include data from New South Wales
liver/gastroenterology units, liver transplant physicians and surgeons and/or
general practitioners with appropriate experience. Access to specialised clinics
should be available irrespective of whether the place of residence of the PWH is
in a metropolitan, regional or rural setting.
Care should be taken by staff or individuals performing IV injections for factor
replacement for PWH to avoid needle stick injuries.
3.2. Hepatitis C
Many of the PWH receiving pooled plasma concentrates prior to the late 1980s
were infected with hepatitis C. In many cases the duration of infection is greater
than 20 years and PWH are at significant risk of developing cirrhosis and
3.2.1. Assessment of liver disease
A liver biopsy is the optimal assessment of liver function. Aledort [4] reported in
1985 a significant risk of morbidity and mortality from liver biopsy in PWH.
However, more recent studies [5, 6, 7] have demonstrated that liver biopsy can
be performed safely in PWH if appropriate hospitalisation and factor replacement
McMahon et al [5] reported 21 percutaneous liver biopsies undertaken in PWH
with no bleeding with either intermittent or continuous factor infusion for up to 5
days. DiMichele et al [6] reported transjugular liver biopsy as safe and diagnostic
in 13 adult patients. PWH had factor replacement for up to 5 days and remained
hospitalized for 48 hours. Stieltjes [7] reported a large series of transjugular liver
biopsies in 69 of 151 PWH and hepatitis C. Mild adverse events were recorded in
8% with haematoma at the puncture site and abdominal pain without evidence of
intra-abdominal haemorrhage. Saab et al [8] reported eleven patients undergoing
outpatient transjugular liver biopsy who were monitored initially for 4 hours and
received factor replacement for 3 days. No complications were noted.
Liver biopsy should only be performed by an experienced operator, with factor
replacement monitored at a HTC, and only if the result will clarify the diagnosis or
have an effect on therapeutic options. Transjugular biopsy can be performed if
experienced staff are available.
Prior to biopsy, (in addition to routine coagulation assessment and treatment)
factor levels should be raised to 0.7-1.0 U/ml by bolus infusion of Factor VIII or IX
for PWH A and B respectively and then maintained by either intermittent bolus
infusions or continuous infusion for 3 days. Reduced factor replacement to
maintain levels of 0.3 U/ml should be considered for the next 2 days. PWH
undergoing liver biopsy may be hospitalised for 48 hours. Post biopsy ultrasound
can be considered.
3.2.2. Liver transplantation
Liver transplant may be considered for Hepatitis C or its complications. As both
Factor VIII and IX are produced in the liver, liver transplantation cures
haemophilia. Haemophilia should not be an exclusion for consideration for liver
transplantation. HIV coinfection is not a contraindication to liver transplant.
3.3.1. Increased bleeding in PWH
In 1999 Wilde et al [9] reported increased bleeding tendency in PWH on protease
inhibitor (PI) therapy. There was an increased frequency of bleeds and atypical
bleeds into small joints, soft tissues and muscles. Increased bleeding in the
genitourinary tract has also been reported [9]. Ritonavir was the most common PI
implicated and bleeding episodes decreased after changing the PI. Racoosin [10]
summarized reported adverse events to the FDA, noting an increase in bleeding
episodes in haemophiliacs compared to non-haemophiliacs on PIs. Rechallenge
with other PIs was associated with bleeding. Serious haemorrhages can occur,
including intracranial haemorrhage, and may necessitate cessation of PI therapy
[11]. Amprenavir [12] and Lopinavir-Ritonavir [13] have been reported to be
associated with atypical bleeding. All PWH on PIs should be closely observed for
atypical bleeds.
3.3.2. Septic arthritis
Septic arthritis may occur in arthritic joints and joint replacements in PWH with
HIV [14]. Septic arthritis, which may be afebrile, should be considered in any joint
bleed which is unresponsive to factor replacement and may require increased
amounts of pain relief.
3.3.3. Reproductive choices
HIV infection may now be considered a chronic illness and many PWH of
reproductive age may desire to have children. Previous options for HIV
discordant couples with haemophilia were the use of frozen quarantined HIV
negative donor sperm, adoption or not to have children. With improvements in
intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or sperm washing can now be considered
[15]. Collection of sperm when viral loads are unrecordable following HAART
should be considered to further reduce risks. Specific counselling and
collaboration with IVF clinics is recommended.
3.3.4. Thrombocytopenia
Thrombocytopenia can be due to a variety of causes. The risk of bleeding in a
PWH will vary due to the cause. Prophylactic factor replacement infusions can be
considered on an individual basis and clinical grounds.
3.4. HIV/HCV Coinfection
PWH are more likely to be infected with HCV- genotype 1. The duration of
infection is usually greater than 20 years. HIV has been shown to accelerate the
course of HCV chronic liver disease and HCV appears to worsen the prognosis
of HIV [16]. Wilde et al [16] suggest that pegylated interferon/Ribavirin
combination therapy should be considered in patients with stable HIV on or off
HAART with CD4 counts >0.2 x 109/L., but each case should be assessed
individually. As with hepatitis C monoinfection, liver biopsy should only be
considered if the result will affect diagnosis or therapeutic options and only after
adequate factor replacement.
REFERENCES
1. ANCAHRD, A Model of Care for the Management of Hepatitis C Infection in
Adults, Australian National Council on AIDS, Hepatitis C and Related
2. ASHM, HIV Management in Australasia: A guide for clinical care (revised
edition), Australasian Society for HIV Medicine, 2004.
3. ASHM, Coinfection HIV & Viral Hepatitis: A guide for clinical management,
(revised edition) ,Australasian Society for HIV Medicine, 2006.
4. Aledort LM, Levine PH, Hilgartner M, A study of liver biopsies and liver
disease among hemophiliacs. Blood 1985; 66: 367-72.
5. McMahon C, Pilkington R, Shea EO, Kelleher D, Smith OP. Liver biopsy in
Irish hepatitis C-infected patients with inherited bleeding disorders. Br. J.
Haem. 2000; 109: 354-359.
6. DiMichele DM, Mirani G, Wilfredo Canchis P, Trost DW, Talah AH.
Transjugular liver biopsy is safe and diagnostic for patients with congenital
bleeding disorders and hepatitis C infection. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 613-618.
7. Stieltjes N, Ounnoughene N, Sava E, Paugy P, Roussel-robert V, Rosenberg
ADR, Terris B, Salmon-Ceron D, Sogni P. Interest of transjugular liver biopsy
in adult patients with haemophilia or other congenital bleeding disorders
infected with Hepatitis C. Br. J. Haem, 2004; 125: 769-776.
8. Saab S, Cho D, Quon DVK, Ibrahim AB, Dong P, Marder V, Logan L. Same
day outpatient transjugular liver biopsies in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2004;
9. Wilde JT, Lee CA, Collins P, Giangrande PLF, Winter M, Schiach CR.
Increased bleeding associated with protease inhibitor therapy in HIV positive
patients with bleeding disorders. Br. J. Haem. 1999; 107: 556-559.
10. Racoosin JA, Kessler CM. Bleeding episodes in HIV positive patients taking
protease inhibitor: a case series. Haemophilia 1999; 5: 266-269.
11. Hollmig KA, Beck SB, Doll DC. Severe bleeding complications in HIV positive
Haemophiliac patients treated with protease inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Res.
2001; 6(3): 112-114.
12. Kodoth S, Bakshi S, Scierneca P, Black K, Pakwa S. Possible linkage of
amprenavir with intracranial bleeding in HIV infected haemophiliac. AIDS
Patient Care STDS 2001; 15(7): 347-52.
13. Yazdanpanah Y, Viget N, Cheret A, Guerroumi H, Gerard Y, Ajana Caron J,
Mouton Y. Increased bleeding in HIV -positive haemophilic patients treated
with lopinavir-ritonavir. AIDS 2003; 17;16: 2397-9.
14. Hicks JL, Ribbans WJ, Buzzard B, Kelley SS, Toft L, Torri G, Wied JD, York
J. Infected joint replacements in HIV positive patients with haemophilia. J.
Bone Join. Surg Br. 2001; 83(7): 10.
15. Pena JA, Klein J, Thornton MH, Sauer MV. Providing assisted reproductive
care to male Haemophiliacs infected with Human Immunodefiency Virus:
Preliminary experience. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 309-316.
16. Wilde JT. HIV and HCV coinfection in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 1-
Source: http://www.ahcdo.org.au/sitebuilder/publications/knowledge/asset/files/9/hivhepcguidelinesver226.5.pdf
Empirical calibration Martijn J. Schuemie, Marc A. Suchard In observational studies, there is always the possibility that an effect size estimate is biased. This can betrue even for advanced, well thought out study designs, because of unmeasured or unmodeled confounding.Negative controls (test-hypotheses where the exposure is not believed to cause the outcome) can be usedto detect the potential for bias in a study, and with enough negative controls we can start to estimatethe systematic error distribution inherent in an observational analysis. We can then use this estimateddistribution to compute a calibrated p-value, which reflects the probability of observing an effect size estimate
GUÍA DE SEGUIMIENTO DE LOS PACIENTES Laura Tuneu Valls Miquel Rojas Cano Montse Sardans Marquillas Elisa Paredes Pérez Correo Farmacéutico ha cedido los derechos depublicación de la guía "SeguimientoFarmacoterapéutico de los pacientes conAlzheimer" que obtuvo el máximo galardón en elSegundo Premio en Atención Farmacéutica.